Friday, December 4, 2009

justice

what do we do when a minor circumstance and what could be deemed as casual interaction lead to justice dilemma? As i was going through my day, what was intended to be relaxing and unobtrusive event ended into a dilemma for me. although parties involved might not have perceived it in a similar way, i had to think through how our act would perpetuate a tendency to assume and default to the negativistic and selfish view of 'its just how people are these days' kinda thinking. there were issues of how we thought only of ourselves and rationalized our behaviors to justify our actions. Blame toward the other party was even concocted in order to further rationalize the behavior. what i kept thinking was, if we behave this way already when we have plenty of resources, how would we behave when there is scarcity and the desperation for survival means comes into picture. i really had to sit through and think about how i could act on this. am i going to do something for the sake of saving face (so Chinese of me), or are there larger implications of how i need to consider the welfare of others due to my action/inaction?
How much of my own desires to not pay where due is needed perpetuate an injustice and selfishness that distort our sense of responsibility not just to others, but to ourselves for the resources that we use. How much of our refusal to take on our responsibility do we then impose onto others to take on, because we refuse to recognize and accept our own? So much for a relaxing day....

Saturday, June 13, 2009

some questions...


This is the Cathedral at Plaza de Armas in Cuzco, another is facing opposing it. I looked through the amazing structures and chapels within this church, and was amazed at how delicately crafted and detailed the paintings and art were.

I walked through it using a audio guide and listened to archbishops and other priests of this church tell its history. I knew that missionaries and monks used cultural figures in order to communicate with the indigenous locals. Using local metaphors in order to interpret theological issues in a culturally sensitive manner. It was actually interesting to see a guinea pig at the center of the Last Supper being shared by Jesus and the disciples. This example, however leads to a question of how do metaphors and interpretations change the meaning of the subject. Some have the leeway of not having a crucial effect of delineating from the central context, such as, having the guinea pig at the center of the Last Supper. But how about the role of the saints? This has been a main source of criticism for many Catholics from their Protestant counterparts.
Through the Cathedral, there were several statues of saints and some were identified as the saint that people ask prayers from to help them gain wives or husbands (almost tempted on this one). I'm aware that part of what took place with Santeria and some voodoo gods during the colonization was to project the identities of these gods onto Catholic saints as a way of preserving their religion and to avoid perishing from the consequences of the inquisition. A covert way to maintain their culture and faith. However, so much of these have been adapted into the religion that this has become part of the mainstream catholic practices in some cultures, warranting the criticism of idolatrous practices. (such as the concept of 'praying to the saints' to receive their wishes...which i believe is the bastardization of asking the saints to pray for them) So, how do we practice and balance cultural values that are necessary to communicate and digest theological issues, while avoiding it to change the central theology of the Bible? With the appreciation that there are also discussions on how to have a balanced interpretation of the Bible since for most of what we currently think and interpret have always been interpreted through the lenses of the hegemonic groupings of the Western world?
Another picture of the smaller cathedral on the other side of the plaza.

Sunday, February 8, 2009

Change (recommmendation: you should listen to Tracy Chapman's "Change" while reading this)

So having gone through multiple meetings in collaboration with gov't agencies in how to determine and plan for the lives of children we care for, i find myself frequently frustrated and appalled that people who spend 1hr a month (the most for some) could determine and decide the lives of families and welfare of children. is this an isolated phenomena? i pessimistically don't think so since i've been to two different counties that inadequately think and relate with families who are crisis, yet casually decide how their lives ought to be lived. Change for the better needs to happen soon, but when individuals who are supposed to advocate for families are not always keeping the family's welfare in mind instead of their own, who will stand up for them?

Shift to another change...

Recently after speaking with a friend about such situations, references of other experiences, some first hand, continue to suggest that maybe, maybe, although there are some changes, we still have a long road to go. college students who are ordered to lie face down on the streets for an unverifiable and illegitimate road stop merely because the color of their skin did not fit the assumed appropriate ones of a community, really??! i emphasize this because if i am not careful of my own reactions, i could ask this question in such a disbelief, but could be interpreted in multiple ways...disbelief that it is shocking to hear about it because i cannot fathom because this is not my own reality; disbelief that people continue to be treated with such injustice that it is unfathomable...maybe disbelief and unfathomable are inappropriate labels the least, but also conceptualization. Disbelief and unfathomable are ready expressions, yet when one really thinks about it, these are pretty inappropriate things to say when one shares about horrible and unjust experiences that have been lived by many, and to say that they are unfathomable and are a disbelief, have maybe just distanced and somewhat denied the reality of one's experience. a change is necessary in our conceptualization, and hopefully a change in the reality that we live in how we treat and relate with others at the very least.

maybe when we change the way we relate and consider others could we be more CareFull in how we think and suggest how to help families and how we also relate and think of others.